首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

简论中西刑事和民事诉讼证明标准
引用本文:胡信华.简论中西刑事和民事诉讼证明标准[J].广东经济管理学院学报,2004,19(5):83-87.
作者姓名:胡信华
作者单位:广东经济管理学院,广东,广州,510400
摘    要:西方国家的刑事诉讼证明标准是排除合理怀疑或内心确信,民事诉讼证明标准是优势证据证明,这是一种主观真实或法律真实的证明标准。我国诉讼证明以辩证唯物主义可知论为基础,强调客观真实,要求证据确实充分。这是一种理想化的证明标准,具有重大缺陷,应以法律真实的证明标准取代,刑事诉讼适用排除合理怀疑原则,民事诉讼适用优势证据证明原则。我国刑事诉讼和民事诉讼应实行高低不同的证明标准,以适应两种诉讼各自的特点和规律。

关 键 词:证明标准  主观真实  客观真实  排除合理怀疑  优势证据证明
文章编号:1672-4100(2004)05-0083-05
修稿时间:2004年5月27日

A Brief Study of Proving Standards in Chinese and Western Criminal and Civil Lawsuit
Hu Xinhua.A Brief Study of Proving Standards in Chinese and Western Criminal and Civil Lawsuit[J].Journal of Guangdong Institute of Business Administration,2004,19(5):83-87.
Authors:Hu Xinhua
Abstract:The proving standard of Western criminal lawsuit is to be rid of rational suspicion or confirm of guilt at heart. The proving standard of Western civil lawsuit is to prove advantageous evidence. It reflects subjective truth or legal truth. The proving standard of lawsuit in our country is based on emphasizes the objective truth of evidence. Demanding accurate and adequate,it is an ideal proving standard and embodies defects. Therefore,our proving standard should be replaced by the proving standard of focusing on legal truth. The principle of being rid of rational suspicion should be applied to criminal lawsuit,while the principle of proving advantageous evidence is applied to civil lawsuit. To adopt different proving standards is to suit their respective characteristics and rule.
Keywords:proving standard  subjective truth  objective truth  get rid of rational suspicion  proving advantageous evidence
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号