| Abstract: | The application of First Amendment commercial speech doctrine to integrated marketing communication (IMC) demonstrates that the integration of public relations messages with advertising and marketing messages may dilute the constitutional protection afforded corporate speech. This analysis of U.S. Supreme Court precedents shows that by intermingling political expression with commercial expression, a corporation may expand the range of communication that may be defined and regulated as commercial speech. The additional review of a California Supreme Court case that redefined commercial speech to include public relations messages illustrates the potential for heightened regulation of integrated marketing communication. |
