Das Fach Kommunikationswissenschaft |
| |
Authors: | Prof Dr Klaus-Dieter Altmeppen Annika Franzetti Dipl-Journ Tanja Kössler Dipl-Journ |
| |
Institution: | 1. Katholische Universit?t Eichst?tt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstra?e 25, 85072, Eichst?tt, Deutschland
|
| |
Abstract: | Communication Science appears to become more and more professionalized and seems to increase its research activities and publications. Yet there are no far empirical data to support what seems to be evident. In a survey among DGPuK members in 2010, Altmeppen et al. (2011) found a status quo that shows two interesting aspects: German Communication Science has extended its research activity and, at the same time, differentiated itself substantively and methodically. The data also show that the survey instrument used in the past does not grasp the discipline’s thematic, theoretic, and methodical diversity any more. This finding is a challenge to the field: Communication Science must find a way to systematize and structure itself in order to gather all thematic and methodic directions under one umbrella, considering both the broad avenues and the side roads. Based on the 2010 data and the existing survey categories, this paper develops an empirical instrument that can be used to examine, in a long term design, the research activities in Communication Science and demonstrate, to the discipline itself and to outside observers, its multifarious facets and its dynamic. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|