| 对NAFTA争端解决机构权限缺失的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陆蓉,何祖普.对NAFTA争端解决机构权限缺失的思考[J].边疆经济与文化,2007(4):15-16. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陆蓉 何祖普 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广西师范大学,法学院,广西,桂林,541004;广西师范大学,法学院,广西,桂林,541004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 众所周知,WTO的上诉机构因为缺乏事实认定权和发回重审权而给其机制的运行造成消极影响;无独有偶,NAFTA第19章反倾销反补贴(AD/CVD)争端解决机制的专家组也因缺乏撤销权和改判权而影响了机制的效率,与国内法院的审判机制相比,两个争端解决机制是在跛脚行走.解决的办法是修订规则,扩大审判机构现有的权限.
|
| 关 键 词： | 争端解决机制 WTO NAFTA |
| 文章编号： | 1672-5409（2007）04-0015-02 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-10-19 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年10月19日 |
Study On the Power - lack of Dispute Settlement Machinism in WTO and NAFTA |
| |
| LU Rong,HE Zu-pu.Study On the Power - lack of Dispute Settlement Machinism in WTO and NAFTA[J].The Border Economy and Culture,2007(4):15-16. |
| |
| Authors: | LU Rong HE Zu-pu |
| |
| Abstract: | It is well - known that rurming of the Appellate Body of DSB in WTO has been influenced for lacking fact -decide power and remand power. While ,the panel of chapter 19 dispute settlement of NAFTA has been criticized for lacking revise -power and correct- power. In relation to common justice institution , they are not perfect. In order to solve the problem ,we should revise the principle ,extend the right of trial organization. |
| |
| Keywords: | DSM WTO NAFTA |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
