首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Determinants of fiscal multipliers revisited
Institution:1. Charles University, Prague and University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Slovakia;2. Central Bank of Hungary, Vienna University of Economics and Business and Masaryk University, Brno;3. National Bank of Slovakia, Charles University, Prague and Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria;4. Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria;1. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, United States;2. Georgia State University, Georgia, United States;3. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, United States;1. Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), Welthandelsplatz 1, Vienna 1020, Austria;2. Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Austria;3. International Institute of Applied System Analysis (IIASA), Austria;4. Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital (WIC), Austria;5. Department of Applied Statistics, Johannes Kepler University Linz (JKU), Austria;6. Research Institute for Economics of Inequality (INEQ), Austria;7. Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), Austria;1. GATE-CNRS, University Lumière Lyon 2 93, chemin des Mouilles - B.P.167, ECULLY cedex 69131, France;2. CRIEF, University of Poitiers, France;1. Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria;2. Wittgenstein Center for Demography and Global Human Capital (IIASA,VID/OEAW,WU), Austria;3. International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria;4. Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Austria;5. Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), Germany;6. University of Leipzig, Germany;1. Mercatus Center, George Mason University, 3434 Washington Blvd., 4th Floor, Arlington, VA 22201, United States;2. Monash University Wellington Road Victoria 3145 Australia
Abstract:We generalize a simple New Keynesian model and show that a flattening of the Phillips curve reduces the size of fiscal multipliers at the zero lower bound (ZLB) on the nominal interest rate. The factors behind the flatting are consistent with micro- and macroeconomic empirical evidence: it is a result of, not a higher level of price rigidity, but an increase in the degree of strategic complementarity in price-setting – invoked by the assumption of a specific instead of an economy-wide labour market, and decreasing instead of constant-returns-to-scale. In normal times, the efficacy of fiscal policy and resulting multipliers tends to be small because negative wealth effects crowd out consumption, and because monetary policy endogenously reacts to fiscally-driven increases in inflation and output by raising rates, offsetting part of the stimulus. In times of a binding ZLB and a fixed nominal rate, an increase in (expected) inflation instead lowers the real rate, leading to larger fiscal multipliers. Conditional on being in a ZLB-environment, under a flatter Phillips curve, increases in expected inflation are lower, so that fiscal multipliers at the ZLB tend to be lower. Finally, we also discuss the role of solution methods in determining the size of fiscal multipliers.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号