Changes in property-use relationships on French farmland: A social innovation perspective |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, United Kingdom;2. Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padua, Viale dell''Universita 16 / AGRIPOLIS Campus, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy;3. Information and Computation Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, United Kingdom;4. Ukrainian National Forestry University & The James Hutton Institute, United Kingdom Generala Chuprynky St. 103, Office 36, Lviv 79057, Ukraine;5. European Forest Institute, St. Pau Art Nouveau Site - St. Leopold Pavilion, St. Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain;1. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, BOKU, and EFICEEC – The European Forest Institute, Regional Office for Central and Eastern European Countries, Feistmantelstr. 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria;2. University of Oulu, Cultural anthropology, PO BOX 1000, 90014, Finland;3. Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8 QH, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Land issues are a major constraint for resource management, whether it relates to urban planning, environmental protection or agricultural development. There is presently a proliferation of initiatives by a diversity of actors, that produce notable changes in terms of land tenure. A few studies have described some of them in France, without analysing the change mechanisms. Moreover, land tenure is often difficult to understand given its complexity and its multiple dimensions. Here, we propose an analysis of land tenure changes with the lens of property-use relationships (PUR), through a social innovation framework. This allows us to analyse the collective action at the heart of change. The analysis rests upon two case studies selected for their multiscale character, and as two different entries to scrutinize land changes: the “Terre de Liens” movement, a new actor stemming from civil society; and the “rural land lease subject to environmental clauses”, a recent authorized instrument of tenancy contract. These land tenure changes are important although circumscribed because they involve all actors’ spheres and scales and create new frameworks. These changes contribute to express societal demands through new lessor’s management right. Where the parties to the PUR share a common reference framework and the same agricultural development objective, the conditions set out in the PUR seem guaranteed. If they do not, a mutual acculturation process seems necessary – beyond the contractual terms – to enable a compromise between the management rationales of a protected area in one hand, and a farm on the other hand. |
| |
Keywords: | Farmland Bundle of rights Property rights Agriculture Social innovation Collective action |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|