Farmland transition in China and its policy implications |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;3. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;4. Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Nanning Normal University, The Ministry of Education, Nanning 530001, China;1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;2. Center for Assessment and Research on Targeted Poverty Alleviation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;3. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;5. Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Guangxi Teachers Education University, The Ministry of Education, Nanning 530001, China;1. School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China;2. Department of Urban Planning, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China;1. Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Guangxi Teachers Education University, The Ministry of Education, Nanning 530001, China;2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;3. Center for Assessment and Research on Targeted Poverty Alleviation, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;4. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;2. Center for Assessment and Research on Targeted Poverty Alleviation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;3. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
| |
| Abstract: | China’s land use structure is closely related to its economic development. Based on the theoretical analysis framework of China’s farmland transition (FT), this paper establishes an evaluation index system for quantifying FT from two dimensions, the dominant transition and recessive transition, and uses K-means clustering to quantitatively divide the phases of FT in China over the past four decades. The results show that the FT in China has experienced several phases from slow transition, rapid transition, to steady transition and innovation transition, and demonstrates clear regional differences. The dominant transition phase, social and ecological farmland transition, mainly occurred during 2000–2010. The economic farmland transition occurred earlier, during 1990–2000. Spatially, the economic farmland transition gradually shifted from the southeast coastal area to the inland. The “structure-function” transition of China’s farmland in the past four decades can be divided into four phases: the preliminary exploration and development phase, the steady development and expansion phase, the market-oriented reform and deepening phase, and the reform and innovation phase. Finally, relevant policy implications and suggestions were proposed for the optimal management and regulation of farmland according to the characteristics of FT, its challenges and people’s new demand for farmland functions. |
| |
| Keywords: | Sustainable land use Supply-demand perspective Structure-function perspective Food security Urban-rural integrated development Rural vitalization Ecological civilization |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
