首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Stabilization policy,infrastructure investment,and welfare in a small open economy
Institution:1. Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. Córdoba 2122, RA–1120 Buenos Aires, Argentina;2. Laboratorio TANDAR, Departamento de Física, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Av. del Libertador 8250, RA–1429 Buenos Aires, Argentina;3. Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, RA–1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina;4. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Av. Rivadavia 1917, RA–1033 Buenos Aires, Argentina;1. University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, King''s College, London, & Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany;2. THM Business School, Giessen, Germany;1. WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management, Burgplatz 2, 56179, Vallendar, Germany;2. EBS Business School, Burgstraße 5, 65375, Oestrich-Winkel, Germany;1. Department of Business Administration, Athens University of Economics and Business, 76 Patission Street, GR-10434, Athens, Greece;2. IPAG Business School, 184 Boulevard Saint-Germain, FR-75006, Paris, France;3. Centre for Planning and Economic Research, 11 Amerikis Street, GR-10672, Athens, Greece
Abstract:Using a two-sector neoclassical growth model in an open economy setting with heterogeneous agents, this paper studies the distributional effects and welfare implications of a joint monetary and fiscal policy response to public infrastructure expansion in emerging market economies. The results show that fiscal stabilization policy is critical for achieving fiscal sustainability and price stability. With joint support of monetary and fiscal policy, government infrastructure investment provides significant welfare gains to the economy, and the choice of fiscal instruments has major distributional effects across agents: saving households accrue the highest welfare gains with new bond issuance, while hand-to-mouth consumers are better off when non-distorting taxes are adjusted. These potential tradeoffs in welfare due to households’ differing responses to infrastructure expansion have important implications for policy making.
Keywords:Infrastructure investment  Fiscal stabilization  Economic growth of emerging market economies  Welfare  O11  O23  E63  F43
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号