首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Exclusionary pricing in two-sided markets
Institution:1. European Commission, DG Comp, Belgium;2. Imperial College London, United Kingdom;3. University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy;1. Toulouse School of Economics, Esplanade de l’Université 1, Toulouse 31080, France;3. Department of Economics and Business, University of Catania, C.so Italia 55, Catania 95129, Italy;4. Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK;5. Department of Economics/NIPE, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga 4710-057, Portugal;6. Department of Economics, University of Bergen, Norway;1. School of Economics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China;2. Department of Economics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada;3. Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;1. PUC-Chile;2. Tel-Aviv University;3. KU Leuven;1. Management School, University of Liverpool, Chatham Street, Liverpool L69 7ZH, United Kingdom;2. Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, 9 Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 4DT, United Kingdom;3. Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE), Germany
Abstract:This paper studies the incentives to engage in exclusionary pricing in the context of two-sided markets. Platforms are horizontally differentiated, and seek to attract users of two groups who single-home and enjoy indirect network externalities from the size of the opposite user group active on the same platform. The entrant incurs a fixed cost of entry, and the incumbent can commit to its prices before the entry decision is taken. The incumbent has thus the option to either accommodate entry, or to exclude entry and enjoy monopolistic profits, albeit under the constraint that its price must be low enough to not leave any room for an entrant to cover its fixed cost of entry. We find that, in the spirit of the literature on limit pricing, under certain circumstances even platforms find it profitable to exclude entrants if the fixed entry cost lies above a certain threshold. By studying the properties of the threshold, we show that the stronger the network externality, the lower the thresholds for which incumbent platforms find it profitable to exclude. We also find that entry deterrence is more likely to harm consumers the weaker are network externalities, and the more differentiated are the two platforms.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号