首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


An examination of the gap between carbon offsetting attitudes and behaviors: Role of knowledge,credibility and trust
Affiliation:1. Finnish Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 17, FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland;2. Department of Geosciences and Geography, FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland;3. Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Finland;4. School of Resource Wisdom, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014, Finland;1. ZEW – Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, L 7, 1, 68161 Mannheim, Germany;2. Department of Economics, University of Kassel, Nora-Platiel-Str. 5, 34109 Kassel, Germany;3. KfW Research, KfW Group, Palmengartenstraße 5-9, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;4. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2 Rue Andre-Pascal, 75775 Paris CEDEX 16, France
Abstract:This study explores factors that contribute to the gap between hospitality consumers’ beliefs toward carbon offsetting and their actual behaviors by evaluating the interactions between knowledge, credibility, and trust and their impacts on behavioral intentions. Findings suggest that knowledge, trust, and credibility impact tourists’ attitudes in different manners and to different degrees. The study further shows that objective knowledge has more significant impacts on attitudes than subjective knowledge, and that opposing trends are shown between trust in hospitality companies and credibility of climate science. Findings indicate disparate impacts of knowledge on attitudes and perceived behavioral control though the mediating factors of trust and credibility. Implications for messaging, education, and possible interventions to increase participation levels in voluntary carbon offset programs are discussed.
Keywords:Hospitality  Carbon emissions  Carbon offsetting  Knowledge  Credibility  Trust  Theory of planned behavior
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号