Race to burn the last ton of carbon and the risk of stranded assets |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Etla Economic Research, Finland;2. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, Finland;3. University of Helsinki, Finland;1. Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany;2. German Development Institute, Germany;1. Department of Environmental Economics and Management, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel;2. Department of Environmental Economics and Management and the Center for Agricultural Economic Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel |
| |
Abstract: | A cap on global warming implies a tighter carbon budget which can be enforced with a credible second-best renewable energy subsidy designed to lock up fossil fuel and curb cumulative emissions. Such a subsidy brings forward the end of the fossil fuel era but accelerates fossil fuel extraction and global warming in the short run. A weaker fossil fuel oligopoly implies that anticipation of a given global carbon budget induces fossil producers to deplete reserves more voraciously and accelerate global warming. This race to burn the last ton of carbon is more intensive for the feedback than open-loop Nash equilibrium, so that the Green Paradox effect of a renewable energy subsidy is stronger. There is an intermediate phase of limit pricing to keep renewable energy producers at bay, which becomes much more relevant when a cap on global warming is enforced. A stronger fossil fuel oligopoly lengthens the period of limit pricing and typically brings forward the carbon-free era. Finally, the mere risk of a cap on global warming being enforced at some unknown, future date makes fossil fuel extraction more voracious and accelerates global warming. |
| |
Keywords: | Second-best climate policy Green paradox Carbon budget Stranded assets Oligopolistic resource markets Limit pricing Voracious extraction Regime shift H21 Q51 Q54 |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|