Assessing the environmental impact of 3D public law restrictions |
| |
| Institution: | 1. State Geodetic Administration, Gru?ka 20, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;2. Geoweb, Radni?ka ulica 47, 44000 Sisak, Croatia;3. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Geodesy, Ka?i?eva 26, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;1. King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Environmental Design, Geomatics department, Al Ehtifalat St, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia;2. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Section GIS Technology, Julianalaan 134, P.O. Box 5030, 2600 GA, Delft, the Netherlands;3. University of New South Wales, Faculty of Built Environment, Kensington Campus, NSW, 2052, Sydney, Australia;4. TU Delft Safety & Security Institute, Delft University of Technology, Faculty Technology, Policy and Management, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX, Delft, the Netherlands;1. Warsaw University of Technology, Department of Cadastre and Land Management, Plac Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland;2. National Technical University of Athens, School of Rural & Surveying Engineering, 125, Char. Trikoupi str., 11473 Athens, Greece;3. University of Twente (ITC), Hengelosestraat 99, 7514 AE Enschede, the Netherlands;4. Technical University Vienna, Department for Geodesy and Geoinformation, Gusshausstr. 27-29, 1040 Vienna, Austria;5. University of Gävle, SE-801 76 Gävle, Sweden;6. Aalborg University, A.C. Meyers Vænge 15, DK-2450 Copenhagen SV, Denmark;7. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Real Estate Planning and Land Law, Teknikringen 10B, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden;8. State Geodetic Administration, Gru?ka 20, Zagreb, Croatia;9. University of West Bohemia, Technická 8, Pilsen, Czech Republic;10. University of Ljubljana, Jamova cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;1. Eftychia Kalogianni PhD Candidate, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Department GIS Technology, Julianalaan 134, P.O. Box 5030, 2600 GA, Delft, The Netherlands;2. Efi Dimopoulou Professor National Technical University of Athens, School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, P.C. 9 Iroon Polytechneiou str., 15780, Athens, Greece;3. Christiaan Lemmen Professor dr. ir. University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation/ITC PO Box 217, 7500, AE Enschede, The Netherlands;4. Shen Ying Professor Wuhan University, School of Resource and Environmental Sciences 129, Luoyu Road, 430079, Wuhan, China;5. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Section GIS Technology, Julianalaan 134, P.O. Box 5043, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands;1. Swinburne Business School, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia;2. Kadaster International, Netherlands Kadaster, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands;3. ITC Faculty, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands;4. East Delhi Municipal Corporation, Delhi, India;5. Delhi Development Authority, Delhi, India |
| |
| Abstract: | The needs of modern societies require, on the one hand, the most efficient exploitation of land by individual stakeholders and, on the other hand, have set up a variety of restrictions and regulations for the public benefit. Such restrictions are steadily growing in number and apply in various areas. Given the technological development in the construction sector, complex proprietary relations emerge in overlapping private and public rights. Cadastres constitute the core of land administration systems, gradually evolving to development tools that provide multi-purpose land related information. Within this context, incorporation of Public Law Restrictions (PLRs) to cadastral systems is considered a step towards the development of integrated land administration systems. Internationally, PLRs are usually registered in separate registries, under different types and formats, depending on the competent body/authority. These PLRs include, among others, restrictions regarding environment and nature protection, water protection, spatial and land use planning zones, cultural heritage, public infrastructure corridors and zones, public easements/servitudes and mining rights. Until today 3D registration and visualisation of such PLRs is mostly discussed at research level, mainly due to the variety of fields related to each PLR, the need of quantifying qualitative components or “translating” physical attributes to legal restrictions and 3D volumes, as well as to the variety of responsible authorities and types of regulations. This paper focuses on identifying PLRs that pertain either explicit or implicit 3D characteristics, emphasising on the PLRs related to the development of the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) project. This paper aims to identify the nature of 3D PLRs, based on the legal requirements regarding environmental components’ analysis and mapping defined in Environmental Impact Assessment (ESIA) studies, and to investigate the possibility of compiling 3D environmental models from recorded ESIA data. Economic implications of 3D PLR approach is also considered, at qualitative level, in terms of impact on land value when 3D restrictions are imposed, and regarding the cost-effectiveness of drafting ESIA studies showing 3D PLRs. |
| |
| Keywords: | Classification 3D PLRs 3D cadastre Environmental impact |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
