| 常用工程管理方式的对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 胡文发,何新华.常用工程管理方式的对比分析[J].基建优化,2002,23(6):12-14. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 胡文发 何新华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 同济大学,经济与管理学院,上海,200092
2. 上海市航务管理处,上海,200080 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在国内外工程项目管理中，常用的三种工程管理方式为传统总承包方式，设计建造方式和施工管理方式，分别从业主介入施工活动，设计人员参与工程管理，业主变更权力，工程责任划分，项目复杂性，项目进展快慢和项目成本的早期确定等方面分别对比分析常用的三种工程管理方式，有助于指导工程管理实践。
|
| 关 键 词： | 工程项目管理 传统总承包 设计 施工管理 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-7717(2002)05-0012-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年2月10日 |
Analysis and Comparison of Conventional Engineering Management Approaches |
| |
| HU Wen-fa,HE Xin-hua.Analysis and Comparison of Conventional Engineering Management Approaches[J].Optimization of Capital Construction,2002,23(6):12-14. |
| |
| Authors: | HU Wen-fa HE Xin-hua |
| |
| Abstract: | Traditional general contract (TGC), design and build (DB), and construction management (CM) is three familiar engineering management approaches in international and domestic engineering projects. According to clients intervening construction, designers participating in engineering management, clients modification ability in projects, engineering duty clarification, engineering complexity, project scheduling, and early clarification of project cost, the three engineering management approaches are compared and analyzed, which will be of use in engineering management practices. |
| |
| Keywords: | engineering project management traditional general contract (TGC) design and build (DB) construction management (CM) |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
