首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

要物合同的正当性论证之非本体论的视角
引用本文:蒋军洲.要物合同的正当性论证之非本体论的视角[J].改革与战略,2011,27(7):37-40.
作者姓名:蒋军洲
作者单位:河南工业大学法学院,河南郑州,450001
基金项目:河南工业大学高层次人才科研启动基金项目《合意主义体系下的要物合同制度研究》(项目编号:2009BS024)的研究成果
摘    要:文章认为,除去其自身概念的合理性,要物合同制度自被罗马法确立以来被保留至今还有三大方面的理由:一是法律传统使然;二是立法者乐意采用此制度设计还旨在以此等法律规范为当事人的意愿解释提供一种通常的判断,以反映社会实践层面的法律需求;三是因其无偿性,传统要物合同欠缺当事人产生此债的客观意义上的原因,要物合同法律规范所要求的交付则补足了当事人单纯合意的原因欠缺。为此,文章建议保留无偿的传统要物合同,将有偿要物合同予以诺成化改造。

关 键 词:要物合同  法律传统  法律目的  法律伦理

The Justification of Real Contract:an Unontological Perspective
Jiang Junzhou.The Justification of Real Contract:an Unontological Perspective[J].Reformation & Strategy,2011,27(7):37-40.
Authors:Jiang Junzhou
Institution:Jiang Junzhou(Law School,Henan University of Technology,Zhengzhou,Henan 450001)
Abstract:Besides the rationality of the concept of real contract,such system which has been reservered from its emergence from Roman law has three reasons: firstly,it has been reservered because of the legal tradition;secondly,the lawmakers like to adopt such system because these regulations can provide the usual judgment of the intention of the contracting parties,and reflect the needs of social practice;thirdly,because of its gratuitous nature,the traditional real contract lack the objective reason of the contract...
Keywords:real contract  legal tradition  legal intention  legal ethics  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号