首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Accounting for inventory costs and real earnings management behavior
Institution:1. University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, BSN 3311, Tampa, FL 33620, United States of America;2. University of New Hampshire, 10 Garrison Avenue, Durham, NH 03824, United States of America;1. Collins College of Business, University of Tulsa, United States of America;2. Crummer Graduate School of Business, Rollins College, United States of America;3. Saunders College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology, United States of America;2. Fordham University, New York, NY 10023, United States of America;5. Department of Finance, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, United States of America
Abstract:Prior research finds that managers engage in inventory overproduction to inflate current earnings despite the fact that overproduction is associated with significant economic costs. Additionally, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151 (SFAS 151) limited the fixed costs that can be capitalized to inventory in periods of low production, thereby introducing a penalty for underproduction by requiring firms to expense unallocated overhead in the current period. Because periods of underproduction often follow periods of overproduction, and because SFAS 151's emphasis on the subjective determination of normal capacity can erroneously categorize overproducing firms as underproducers in subsequent years, we posit that SFAS 151 makes overproduction less desirable than before. Therefore, we posit that management's propensity to use overproduction to meet earnings benchmarks should decrease after the adoption of SFAS 151. Consistent with expectations, we find a lower propensity to use overproduction to meet benchmarks following SFAS 151. These results challenge the view that SFAS 151 inadvertently encouraged overproduction.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号