技术进步与秩序失调：我国技术时代的社会稳定风险起源

根据主客关系，将技术分为象征技术、治理技术、工程技术、生活技术，进而对4种技术进行论证，探讨其理论意蕴。我国技术发展指导哲学经历了人民意志论、务实的实践理性、有机论的实践理性3个阶段，不同阶段4类技术地位不同，但总体上不匹配。技术进步具有双面性，引发社会稳定风险的原因不仅在于其直接负面效应，更深层次的是4类技术不匹配引发的社会结构变迁，包括文化结构去认同化、治理结构去权威化、社会生活结构物欲化，上述损害是对社会秩序的“蚁穴式蚕食”。社会稳定的核心在于4类技术相互匹配与动态均衡。从技术风险到技术秩序需要着眼于明确象征技术、系统化治理技术、重塑生活技术理念3个途径。

Technological Progress and Disorder: the Origin of Social Stability Risk in China's Technological Age

According to the relationship between subject and object, this paper divides technology into symbolic technology, governance technology, engineering technology and life technology, and then demonstrates the four technologies and explores their theoretical implications. The guiding philosophy of Technological Development in China has gone through three stages: people's will theory, practical rationality and organic rationality. The four types of technological status are different in different stages, but they are not matched in general. Technological progress has two sides. The reason for the risk of social stability lies not only in its direct negative effect, but also in the change of social structure caused by the mismatch of four kinds of technologies, including the de-identification of cultural structure, the de-authorization of governance structure and the materialization of social life structure. These damages are like "ant-nest" encroachments on social order. The core of social stability lies in the matching and dynamic equilibrium of four kinds of technologies. From technological risk to technological order, we need to start with three ways: clarifying the symbolic technology, systematizing the governance technology and remodeling the concept of life technology.