Is capital a collusion device? |
| |
Authors: | Switgard Feuerstein Hans Gersbach |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Alfred Weber-Institut, Universit?t Heidelberg, Grabengasse 14, 69117 Heidelberg, GERMANY (e-mail: switgard.feuerstein@awi.uni-heidelberg.de; gersbach@uni-hd.de),DE |
| |
Abstract: | Summary. We examine how irreversible capital reduces the possibility of a duopoly to sustain implicit collusion by grim strategies, when the product is homogenous and firms compete in quantities. Compared with the case of reversible capital, there are two countervailing effects: Deviation from an existing collusion is less attractive, because capital once installed causes costs forever. But the punishment will also be less severe due to the high capacity the deviating firm can build before punishment starts. The last effect dominates, meaning that the commitment value of capital is negative for all firms. If capital is irreversible, collusion breaks down for realistic magnitudes of interest rates. Received: April 30, 1999; revised version: November 30, 2001 |
| |
Keywords: | and Phrases: Implicit collusion irreversible capital value of commitment Cournot-competition. |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|