首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

碳信息不对称下双渠道供应链的决策分析
引用本文:胡一娟,杨磊. 碳信息不对称下双渠道供应链的决策分析[J]. 物流科技, 2020, 0(6): 127-131
作者姓名:胡一娟  杨磊
作者单位:华南理工大学经济与贸易学院
摘    要:文章在碳交易机制下,研究了制造商占主导地位的双渠道供应链的减排和定价决策,并在碳信息不对称下分析谎报行为对供应链决策和利润的影响。结论表明:(1)制造商低报碳成本信息和碳排放量信息会促进减排。当碳价格较高时,高报碳成本信息和初始碳排放信息会使产品的批发和零售价格增大。(2)从利润的角度出发,制造商会真实的披露碳成本信息和初始碳排放量信息。(3)无论制造商是否谎报碳信息,减排成本系数和消费者对传统零售渠道偏好对最优决策的影响保持不变。

关 键 词:碳交易机制  双渠道供应链  碳信息不对称  谎报行为

Decision Analysis of Dual-channel Supply Chain under Asymmetric Carbon Information
HU Yijuan,YANG Lei. Decision Analysis of Dual-channel Supply Chain under Asymmetric Carbon Information[J]. Logistics Management, 2020, 0(6): 127-131
Authors:HU Yijuan  YANG Lei
Affiliation:(School of Economics and Commerce,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510006,China)
Abstract:Under the cap-and-trade regulation, this paper investigates the emission reduction and pricing decisions of a dual-channel supply chain where the manufacturer is the leader, and the impacts of the misreporting behavior on supply chain decisions and profits under asymmetric carbon information are analyzed. The study analytical shows that:(1) The manufacturer’s underreporting behavior of carbon cost information and initial carbon emissions information will promote emission reduction. When carbon price is high, overstatement of carbon cost information and initial carbon emissions information will increase the wholesale and retail prices of products.(2) From the perspective of profit, the manufacturer will truly disclose carbon cost information and initial carbon emissions information.(3) Regardless of whether the manufacturer misreports carbon information or not, the impacts of emission reduction cost coefficient and consumers’ preference for traditional retail channel on optimal decisions remain unchanged.
Keywords:cap-and-trade regulation  dual-channel supply chain  asymmetric carbon information  misreporting behavior
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号