首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Why Markets in Proto-Deceptive Goods Should Be Restricted
Authors:James Stacey Taylor
Institution:(1) Department of Philosophy, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, 08628, U.S.A.
Abstract:In recent years there has been much philosophical discussion over the question of whether the prohibitions on markets in such items as human body parts and gene sequences, and services such as human reproductive labor and sex, should be lifted. Yet despite the attention paid to this issue there are been surprisingly little discussion of the question of whether markets in certain items that are currently freely traded should be restricted or eliminated. In particular, there has been little discussion of the question of whether markets in items that could be readily used to deceive people should be restricted. I argue in this paper that one of the central moral values of the contemporary West – respect for personal autonomy – requires that such markets be restricted.
Keywords:autonomy  commodification  deception  inalienability  market restriction  regalia  social meaning
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号