论我国犯罪构成要件排列顺序之争

由于将排除社会危害性的行为以及无刑事责任能力之人实施的危害行为排除在犯罪构成研究之外,我国的犯罪构成理论只反映着定罪的结论,而不反映定罪的过程。为此,在通说的理论前提之下,探讨犯罪构成要件的排列顺序并没有多大的实质意义。"修正的四要件理论"实质上改变了犯罪构成要件的性质并参与到犯罪构成要件排列顺序之争。

On Discussion of the Logic Order of Constitutive Elements of Crime

Our traditional theory of Constitutive Elements of a Crime is virtually only to judge whether one act should be punished or not,not to reflect condemnation proceeding,because not only the acts of eliminating social hazards,but also those endangered by persons without criminal responsibility are excluded from traditional fields of our Crime Constitution Theory.Under the prerequisite of our traditional theory,It is little significance to study the logic order of Constitutive Elements of Crime.'Modified Four Elements' change the nature of Constitutive Elements of a Crime and take part in discussion of the logic order of Constitutive Elements of Crime.