首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Factors affecting biasing of capital budgeting cash flow forecasts: evidence from the hotel industry
Authors:Michael J Turner  Chris Guilding
Institution:1. UQ Business School , University of Queensland , St. Lucia Campus, Queensland , 4072 , Australia m.turner@business.uq.edu.au;3. Griffith Business School , Griffith University , Gold Coast Campus, Queensland , 4222 , Australia
Abstract:This study contributes to a neglected aspect of the capital budgeting process, namely, the proposal development stage, which is primarily concerned with project cash flow estimation. Given that the deployment of sophisticated selection techniques is severely undermined when directed to input data suffering from bias, it is surprising that minimal empirical research has sought to explore for antecedent factors associated with biasing of capital budgeting cash flow forecasts. This paper reports the findings of a survey concerned with determining factors associated with biasing of capital budget cash flow forecasts in hotels that are mediated by a management contract. Statistically significant support is provided for the view that higher levels of biasing of capital budget cash flow forecasts occur in the presence of: high emphasis attached to the payback investment appraisal method; deficient reserve funds for furniture, fittings, and equipment (FF&E); low operator accessibility to reserve funds for FF&E; shorter periods of time to management contract expiry; and high emphasis attached to non-financial factors in capital budgeting appraisal.
Keywords:capital budgeting  cash flow forecasting  FF&  E reserve  hotel management contract  payback  power
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号