首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The consequences of discount rate selection for defined benefit liabilities
Institution:1. Earlham College, 801 National Road West, Richmond, IN 47374, USA;2. Nthandco Management Consultants, 1631 NE Broadway, No. 119, Portland, OR 97232, USA;3. Department of Finance, Real Estate and Law, College of Business Administration, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768, USA
Abstract:This paper provides evidence on the use of discount rates for calculating defined benefit liabilities (DBL), and their impact on value relevance and audit fees for Australian listed companies between 2011 and 2016. We document that the average discount rate is 3.96% but the yearly range across companies is 4.03% (2.76% excluding multinationals with multiple plans), despite the fact that AASB 119 provides guidance to use the yield of high quality corporate bonds or, if there is not a deep market, government bonds. We then find that the DBL or unfunded component (DBL less the fair value of the plan’s assets) is value relevant, but is less so when a higher discount rate is used. Furthermore, we document that audit fees are higher when the DBL is larger, or the discount rate is higher, consistent with greater audit effort and risk. Overall, this paper contributes to the accounting literature by documenting both the discretion available in discount rate selection and its consequences.
Keywords:Discount rate  IAS 19  Pension accounting  Audit fees  Value relevance
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号