Controversies as governing processes in technology assessment |
| |
Authors: | Alberto Cambrosio Camille Limoges |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Humanities and Social Studies in Medicine , McGill University , 3655 Drummond Street, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1Y6, Canada;2. Centre derecherche en evaluarion sociale des technologies (CREST) , Université du Québenà Montréal , Case postale 8888 Suceursale A, Montreal, Queber, H3C 3P8, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | The first part of this article shows that in actual practice technology assessment (TA) has clearly moved from its basic conception as a set of objective methodologies developed and used by experts, to a standpoint which increasingly recognizes the need to make room for public participation. This has led to a view of controversies as informal processes of TA. The second part of the article argues for a further step, namely to conceive of TA as a social proces taking place in a space largely defined by controversies. Correlatively, it provides some initial elements for an analytical understanding of controvtersies as the ‘limiting factor’ of TA. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|