Asymmetric pricing of implied systematic volatility in the cross‐section of expected returns |
| |
| Authors: | R. Jared Delisle James S. Doran David R. Peterson |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate, College of Business, Washington State University, Vancouver, Washington;2. Department of Finance, College of Business, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida |
| |
| Abstract: | Assuming a symmetric relation between returns and innovations in implied market volatility, Ang, A., Hodrick, R., Xing, Y., and Zhang, X. (2006) find that sensitivities to changes in implied market volatility have a cross‐sectional effect on firm returns. Dennis, P., Mayhew, S., and Stivers, C. (2006), however, find an asymmetric relation between firm‐level returns and implied market volatility innovations. We incorporate this asymmetry into the cross‐sectional relation between sensitivity to volatility innovations and returns. Using both portfolio sorting and firm‐level regressions, we find that sensitivity to VIX innovations is negatively related to returns when volatility is rising, but is unrelated when it is falling. The negative relation is robust to controls for other variables, suggesting only the increase in implied market volatility is a priced risk factor. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 31:34–54, 2011 |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
