首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Scientific method and retailing research: A retrospective
Authors:James R. Brown  Rajiv P. Dant
Affiliation:a Kmart Corporation Chair in Marketing, College of Business & Economics, West Virginia University, P.O. Box 6025, Morgantown, WV 26506-6025, United States
b Helen Robson Walton Centennial Chair in Marketing Strategy, Division of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, Michael F. Price College of Business, The University of Oklahoma, 307 West Brooks, Norman, OK 73019-4001, United States
Abstract:In this paper, we review the 164 articles published in the Journal of Retailing over the 2002-2007 time-span, the period reviewed by Grewal and Levy in their recent article entitled “Retailing Research: Past, Present and Future” [Grewal, Dhruv and Michael Levy (2007), “Passing the Baton, Journal of Retailing 2001 to 2007,” Journal of Retailing, 83 (4) (in this issue)] for their content. Two study characteristics are reviewed for each publication: (1) approach adopted for methodology (classified into eight categories of Student Surveys, Consumer Surveys, Secondary Data, Laboratory Studies, Industry Surveys, Qualitative Methods, modeling, and other) and (2) inferential tools employed by the scholars. The latter are sub-grouped into six categories of regression, ANOVA/MANOVA, structural equation modeling (SEM), analytical modeling, qualitative analysis, and other. Patterns of the usage of these approaches and techniques are tracked over the years and across content areas. We find that researchers in a particular Substantive Content Area tend to focus on particular methodological approaches and inferential tools. We argue that much is to be gained by shaking up these historical patterns.
Keywords:Retailing   Student Survey   Consumer Survey   Secondary Data   Laboratory Study   Industry Survey   Qualitative Methods   Analytical Modeling   Regression   ANOVA/MANOVA   SEM   Review article
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号