“实质性阻碍”损害标准与中国的新产业建立——以南非对华研磨钢球反倾销案为例

WTO《反倾销协议》和各国反倾销法对于反倾销实践中的损害确定标准在大多数情况下所适用的都是第一条标准,即"实质性损害"标准;而对第二条标准"实质性损害威胁"标准却鲜有适用;至于第三条标准,即"实质性阻碍一国产业建立"的标准更是很少提及。但是,随着中国与其贸易伙伴间贸易摩擦的不断升级以及中国国内新兴产业的日益发展,无论是在中国出口产品遭遇的反倾销案件中,还是在中国国内产业对外提起诉讼的反倾销案件中,适用"实质性阻碍一国产业建立"标准的情况均不断发生。

The Injury Criterion of Material Retardation and the Establishment of China's New Industry

WTO Anti-dumping Agreement and various countries' anti-dumping laws adopt the first criterion,namely the criterion of material injury,in most cases when determining injury in anti-dumping practices,while the second criterion of the threat of material injury has been seldom adopted.As for the third criterion,namely the material retardation of the establishment of an industry,it has been cited by few or no cases in practices.Along with the increasing trade disputes between China and its trade partners and the...