| Abstract: | This paper proposes a new family of specification tests andapplies them to affine term structure models of the London InterbankOffered Rate (LIBOR)-swap curve. Contrary to Dai and Singleton(2000), the tests show that when standard estimation techniquesare used, affine models do a poor job of forecasting volatilityat the short end of the term structure. Improving the volatilityforecast does not require different models; rather, it requiresa different estimation technique. The paper distinguishes betweentwo econometric procedures for identifying volatility. The "cross-sectional"approach backs out volatility from a cross section of bond yields,and the "time-series" approach imputes volatility from time-seriesvariation in yields. For an affine model, the volatility impliedby the time-series procedure passes the specification tests,while the cross-sectionally identified volatility does not.This is surprising, since under correct specification, the "cross-sectional"approach is maximum likelihood. One explanation is that affinemodels are slightly misspecified; another is that bond yieldsdo not span volatility, as in Collin-Dufresne and Goldstein(2002). |
