| 火焰、石墨炉原子吸收法测定自来水中微量铁 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈京京,陈静,卞卫东. 火焰、石墨炉原子吸收法测定自来水中微量铁[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2011, 29(12): 35-37 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈京京 陈静 卞卫东 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 大丰市环境监测站,江苏 大丰,224100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 用火焰原子吸收法和石墨炉原子吸收法对自来水中微量铁进行了比较测定,结果表明,两种方法测定铁的各项指标均在质量控制要求范围内,且各有优点。火焰原子吸收法线性范围宽,干扰少,操作简便,测定速度快;石墨炉原子吸收法取样少,灵敏度高,检出限低。
|
| 关 键 词： | 火焰 石墨炉 原子吸收 铁 |
To Detect Trace Iron in Tap Water with FAAS and EAAS |
| |
| Chen Jinxing,Chen Jing,Bian Weidong. To Detect Trace Iron in Tap Water with FAAS and EAAS[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2011, 29(12): 35-37 |
| |
| Authors: | Chen Jinxing Chen Jing Bian Weidong |
| |
| Affiliation: | Chen Jingjing,Chen Jing,Bian Weidong(Dafeng Environmental Monitoring Station,Dafeng 224100,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The trace iron in tap water was determined by FAAS and EAAS.The comparison results show that the two detection values are within the requirements of quality control,and have its own advantages.FAAS has the advantages of wide range of working curve,less interference,simple operation,fast measurement;EAAS has the advantages of sampling less,high sensitivity,low detection limit. |
| |
| Keywords: | flame graphite furnace atomic absorption iron |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
