首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

广西高质量发展水平评价及时空差异研究
引用本文:李丹婷,周兴,苏珍来,王浩林. 广西高质量发展水平评价及时空差异研究[J]. 科技和产业, 2020, 20(2): 75-80
作者姓名:李丹婷  周兴  苏珍来  王浩林
作者单位:南宁师范大学地理科学与规划学院,南宁530001;南宁师范大学地理科学与规划学院,南宁530001;南宁师范大学地理科学与规划学院,南宁530001;南宁师范大学地理科学与规划学院,南宁530001
摘    要:在分析高质量发展内涵的基础上,从经济高质量、创新高质量、协调高质量、绿色高质量、开放高质量、共享高质量六个方面构建了包括30个指标的广西高质量发展水平评价指标体系;采用熵值法确定权重,综合计算2008年—2017年广西14个地级市的高质量发展水平综合分值以及10年的平均分值;从时间变化和空间差异两个角度对比分析广西的高质量发展状况,综合分析表明,南宁市、桂林市高质量发展水平较高,柳州市、崇左市、钦州市、北海市、防城港市、玉林市高质量发展水平中等,贵港市、梧州市、河池市、贺州市、百色市、来宾市高质量发展水平一般;最后根据分析结果对14个地级市提出相应的高质量发展建议。

关 键 词:高质量发展水平评价  指标体系  熵值法  广西

Evaluation of High Quality Development Level and Spatio-Temporal Difference in Guangxi
Abstract:Based on the analysis of the connotation of high-quality development, the evaluation index system of high-quality development level in Guangxi, including 30 indicators, was constructed from six aspects: high-quality economy, innovative quality, coordinated quality, green quality, open quality and Shared quality. The entropy method was used to determine the weight, and the comprehensive score of high-quality development level of 14 prefecture-level cities in guangxi from 2008 to 2017 and the average score of 10 years were comprehensively calculated. From two angles of time and space difference analysis of Guangxi development of high quality, comprehensive analysis shows that Nanning City and Guilin City have high quality development level, and Liuzhou City, Chongzuo City, Qinzhou City, Beihai City, Fangchenggang City and Yulin City have medium-quality development level, Guigang City, Wuzhou City, Hechi City, Hezhou City, Baise City and Laibin City was general; finally, according to the analysis results, 14 high-quality development suggestions were proposed for 14 prefecture-level cities.
Keywords:high quality development level evaluation  index system  entropy method  Guangxi
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技和产业》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技和产业》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号