首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国高校科研活动全要素生产率研究
引用本文:张璞,王嘉曦,董晓楠. 中国高校科研活动全要素生产率研究[J]. 科技和产业, 2018, 0(9): 66-71
作者姓名:张璞  王嘉曦  董晓楠
作者单位:内蒙古科技大学 经济与管理学院, 内蒙古 包头 014010,内蒙古科技大学 经济与管理学院, 内蒙古 包头 014010,内蒙古科技大学 经济与管理学院, 内蒙古 包头 014010
摘    要:以2006—2015年中国高校科研的基础研究类、应用研究类和试验发展类的相关数据为基础,运用DEA-Malmquist指数方法测算了以上三种科研活动全要素生产率(TFP),并根据其波动情况进行分析。结果显示,第一,基础研究类TFP呈下降趋势,应用研究类和试验发展类TFP呈上升趋势;第二,技术进步率成为影响三种科研活动TFP提高的关键因素,中国有大于五成的省区不能有效、全面地提高三种科研活动TFP;第三,以数据支撑将中国科研能力的分布情况划分为“一类区域”、“二类区域”、“三类区域”、“四类区域”。并针对本文得出的结论提出了相应的建议和对策。

关 键 词:基础研究  应用研究  试验发展  全要素生产率  中国高校

Study on Total Factor Productivity of Scientific Research Activities in Chinese Universities
Abstract:Based on the basic research, applied research and experimental development data of Chinese universities'' scientific research from 2006 to 2015, the paper measured the total factor productivity(TFP) of the above three scientific activities with the method of DEA-Malmquist index , and analyzed according to their fluctuations. This search showed that ,first, the TFP of basic research showed a downward trend, and the TFP of applied research and experimental development showed an upward trend; second, the technical change is the major factor affecting the TFP of the three scientific research activities, and more than 50% of Chinese provinces cannot effectively and comprehensively improve the TFP of the three scientific research activities .Third, based on the data, dividing the distribution of China''s scientific research capabilities into "the first class area", "the second class area ", "the third class area ", and "the fourth class area ". Countermeasures and suggestions was proposed according to the conclusions drawn from this paper.
Keywords:basic research  applied research  experimental development  total factor productivity  Chinese universities
点击此处可从《科技和产业》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技和产业》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号