| 论金融行业反垄断执法机构与行业监管机构的管辖权配置 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李洁. 论金融行业反垄断执法机构与行业监管机构的管辖权配置[J]. 兰州商学院学报, 2012, 28(4): 113-126 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李洁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学,上海,200042 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2011上海市教育委员会科研创新项目“金融行业垄断化趋势的法律对策研究——以反垄断法的适用为视角”(11ZS162)的阶段性成果,并获2012年上海研究生学术论坛优秀论文奖 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 金融行业监管机构与反垄断执法机构之间的反垄断管辖权冲突存在理论上的必然性.通过考察国外金融行业反垄断管辖权的配置模式,本文提出,影响管辖权配置的因素包括金融行业市场发展状况、行业产业政策、监管的成本与效益,以及反垄断执法机构的法律地位和执法经验.结合我国金融行业的实际情况,本文认为在金融行业宜采用反垄断执法机构与行业监管机构双重管辖模式,并应建立充分有效的协调机制.
|
| 关 键 词： | 金融行业 行业监管机构 反垄断执法机构 双重管辖 |
On Jurisdiction Allocation between Antitrust-law Enforcer and Industrial Regulator as in Financial Industry |
| |
| LI Jie. On Jurisdiction Allocation between Antitrust-law Enforcer and Industrial Regulator as in Financial Industry[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College, 2012, 28(4): 113-126 |
| |
| Authors: | LI Jie |
| |
| Affiliation: | LI Jie(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The jurisdiction conflicts between financial industry regulator and antitrust-law enforcer are inevitable in theory.Based on analysis of foreign experiences on jurisdiction over anticompetitive conducts,factors that may affect the jurisdiction can be concluded.Such factors include the development of financial market,industrial policies,cost and profit resulting from supervision as well as antitrust-law enforcer’s legal status and experiences of law enforcement.Taking into account the reality of financial industry in our country,dual-jurisdiction practice,i.e.a practice that both antitrust-law enforcer and industrial regulator have jurisdiction over anticompetitive conducts,as well as a sufficient and efficient coordination mechanism shall be applied to financial industry. |
| |
| Keywords: | financial industry industry regulator antitrust-law enforcer dual-jurisdiction practice |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
