首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

金融自由化利益的纷争和实证分析
引用本文:秦凤鸣.金融自由化利益的纷争和实证分析[J].中央财政金融学院学报,2003(8):32-34.
作者姓名:秦凤鸣
作者单位:山东大学经济学院,济南250100
摘    要:自麦金农和爱德华肖在1973年提出金融深化理论后的30年中,西方许多经济学家对金融自由化的利益倍加关注,并进行了激烈的论战。这些争论带给我们很多有益的启示:金融自由化是一种手段,而不是目的本身;自由化是相对的,过度开放和过度压抑同样都是有害的;金融自由化的后果可以是双重的,有些作用是相互抵消的;金融自由化与危机有关,但后并非前的必然结果。以金融全球化带来的负面影响否认金融全球化的效率和结果是一种偏见。

关 键 词:金融约束  金融自由化  实证分析  效率
文章编号:1000-1549(2003)08-0032-03

Arguments on the Benefits of Financial Liberalization and Empirical Analysis
QIN,Feng-ming.Arguments on the Benefits of Financial Liberalization and Empirical Analysis[J].Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics,2003(8):32-34.
Authors:QIN  Feng-ming
Institution:QIN Feng-ming
Abstract:Mckinnon and Show argued financial development for growth in 1973, since then, they have been followed by a school of economic thinkers who paid much attention to the benefits of financial liberalization, and debated on the theme shapely. All of these arguments gives us a lot of implications: financial liberalization is a tool but not the target itself; liberalization is conception of relativity, both over-opened and over-repression will be harmful to economy; the result of financial liberalization could be dual, some kind of effects may offset each other; liberalization has some relations with financial crisis but not an unique result of liberalization activities. It is bias to take the setback of financial globalization as weapon denying the efficiency and other benefits from the same process.
Keywords:Financial restriction  Financial liberalization  Empirical analysis  Efficiency  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号