| “科学技术是生产力(争论的案例)”分析——兼谈马克思主义研究的科学态度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙孝富. “科学技术是生产力(争论的案例)”分析——兼谈马克思主义研究的科学态度[J]. 内蒙古财经学院学报(综合版), 2009, 0(1): 1-6 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙孝富 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 内蒙古财经学院马克思主义学院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过毛泽东和邓小平关于"科学技术是生产力"论断之争的案例分析,要求马克思主义研究者注重原著文本解读中的语境分析;强调马克思主义研究的学术规范应与政治运作形成良性互动;并注重用与时俱进的立场来看待马克思主义并获得继承性的超越。
|
| 关 键 词： | 毛泽东 邓小平 历史公案 马克思主义 文本解读 研究规范 与时俱进 |
An Analysis of "Science and Technology are the Primary Productive Forces" |
| |
| Sun Xiaofu. An Analysis of "Science and Technology are the Primary Productive Forces"[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Finance and Economics College, 2009, 0(1): 1-6 |
| |
| Authors: | Sun Xiaofu |
| |
| Affiliation: | Inner Mongolia Finance and Economics College;Inner Mongolia;Hohhot;010051 |
| |
| Abstract: | Through a case analysis of Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping's assertion argument on "Science and Technology are the primary productive forces",the author points out that Marxism researchers should attach importance to contextual analysis when reading original works,emphasizes that the academic norms of Marxism research and political operation should form positive interaction and researchers should treat Marxism with the view of "advancing with the times" so as to obtain successive surpassing. |
| |
| Keywords: | Mao Zedong Deng Xiaoping historical legal case Marxism text reading research norms |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
