首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Can breakthrough innovations serve the poor (bop) and create reputational (CSR) value? Indian case studies
Institution:1. Brunel Business School, Brunel University—London, Kingston Lane Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK;2. UNU-MERIT, Keizer Karelplein 19, 6211 TC Maastricht, The Netherlands;3. Department of Economics, Jadavpur University, Calcutta 700032, West Bengal, India;1. Department of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, College of Business, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States;2. Department of Organization and Human Resources, School of Business, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 03063, Korea;1. International Business, HEC Montréal, 3000 chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, H3T 2A7, Canada;2. Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary''s University, 923 Robie St. Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada;3. Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration (EBAPE) at the Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV), Brazil Rua Jornalista Orlando Dantas, 30, 22231-010, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil;1. Management, Operations and Marketing Department, California State University-Stanislaus, Turlock, CA, 95382, United States;2. College of Business and Economics, University of Wisconsin, Whitewater, WI, 53190, United States;3. Department of Management, Information Systems & Entrepreneurship, Carson College of Business, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4743, United States;4. School of Management, Zijingang Campus, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China;1. ADVANCE/CSG, ISEG, Lisbon School of Economics & Management, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua do Quelhas, no. 6, 1200-781 Lisboa, Portugal;2. UNSW Business School, UNSW, Australia;3. VCW Center at NOVA, Nova School of Business and Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1099-032 Lisbon, Portugal
Abstract:Though radical and complex reengineered product innovations are not discussed much in either the ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’ (CSR) or the ‘Base of the Income Pyramid’ (BoP) literature, both support the premise that if an innovation serves the poor, then it will generate CSR gains. To test this assumption with respect to breakthrough technological innovations, the present paper proposes a theoretical construct and uses it to examine two innovations launched in India, namely genetically modified cotton seeds and a HIV/AIDS drugs cocktail. Because firms decide on innovation outlays to maximize profit without including an explicit CSR component, it develops indicators to examine if any involuntary CSR effort was embedded in the innovation strategy. It confirms that though firms do not invest in innovation to earn CSR credit, some breakthrough technological innovations, not all, can trigger CSR returns. There are tradeoffs between CSR effort and BoP innovation market value. Higher the consumer surplus generated by the innovation, better the bargaining position of the innovator vis-à-vis contestations. The windows of opportunity for generating BoP market value and CSR value are context specific. A robust business strategy rather than philanthropy is needed for breakthrough technological innovations to be marketed to BoP communities.
Keywords:Radical innovation  Reengineered innovation  Corporate social responsibility  Base of the pyramid  Monsanto  Cipla
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号