首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Linking key account management practices to performance outcomes
Affiliation:1. Anglia Ruskin University, Lord Ashcroft International Business School, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, United Kingdom;2. University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Marketing, Sir William Dunkan Building, 130 Rottenrow, Glasgow G4 0GE, United Kingdom;1. Department of Marketing, CERS — Centre for Relationship Marketing and Service Management, Hanken School of Economics, PO Box 479, FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland;2. Department of Marketing, Stockholm Business School, Stockholm University, Roslagsvägen 101, Building 7, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden;1. Université Catholique de Lille, IESEG School of Management (LEM UMR CNRS 8179), 3 Rue de la Digue, Lille 59000, France;2. University of Bedfordshire, Putteridge Bury, Hitchen Road, Luton LU2 8LE, United Kingdom;1. University of Nebraska–Lincoln, College of Business Administration, Department of Marketing, 512 N. 12th Street, Lincoln, NE 68588, United States;2. University of Missouri–Kansas City, Henry W. Bloch School of Management, Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, 5110 Cherry Street, Kansas City, MO 64110, United States;1. Edwards School of Business, University of Saskatchewan, 25 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A7, Canada;2. Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, 100 International Drive, Baltimore, MD 21202, United States
Abstract:Many suppliers practice relational strategies that aim to achieve competitive advantage through a collaborative business relationship with their customers. Key account management (KAM) is one such relational strategy that suppliers rely upon to manage their relationships with strategically important customers. Yet suppliers still struggle to put such programs into practice effectively, most likely because academic investigation has yet to report on what actions explain the performance of KAM initiatives. Aiming to fill this gap, we first identify a set of key KAM practices at the strategic, organizational, tactical and control levels of management. Next, we examine how these practices explain the performance of KAM through the mediating effect of the supplier's relational capabilities and the relational outputs that such capabilities produce. The results provide support for most of the hypothesized relationships, showing that the identified practices positively affect performance and dyadic outcomes through the mediation coming from the variables examined. From a theoretical perspective, the study adds to our understanding of the factors underlying effective KAM practices. From a managerial perspective, the results provide insights into how suppliers can achieve KAM effectiveness through relationship-oriented activities, skills and outcomes.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号