首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Competition and confidentiality: Signaling quality in a duopoly when there is universal private information
Affiliation:1. Department of Economics, Columbia University, United States;2. Department of Economics, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea;3. Department of Economics, Stanford University, United States;1. FEMTO-ST Institute DISC dep., University of Franche Comte, Rue Engel Gros, BP 527, 90000 Belfort, France;2. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LIST, MINATEC Campus, F-38054 Grenoble, France;1. Anderson School of Management, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA;2. Department of Finance, National Taiwan University, 106 Taipei, Taiwan;3. Department of Finance, National Dong Hwa University, 974 Hualien, Taiwan;1. Department of Statistics and Operations Research, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia;2. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Suez University, Suez 41522, Egypt;3. Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, Higher Education Complex of Bam, Bam, Kerman, Iran;1. DIETI, Univ. of Naples Federico II, Italy;2. DiSciPol, Second Univ. of Naples, Italy;1. Haas School of Business, University of California Berkeley, United States;2. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, United States
Abstract:We model non-cooperative signaling by two firms that compete over a continuum of consumers, assuming each consumer has private information about the intensity of her preferences for the firms' respective products and each firm has private information about its own product's quality. We characterize a symmetric separating equilibrium in which each firm's price reveals its respective product quality. We show that the equilibrium prices, the difference between those prices, the associated outputs, and profits are all increasing functions of the ex ante probability of high safety. If horizontal product differentiation is sufficiently great then equilibrium prices and profits are higher under incomplete information about quality than if quality were commonly known. Thus, while signaling imposes a distortionary loss on a monopolist using price to signal quality, duopolists may benefit from the distortion as it can reduce competition. Finally, average quality is lower since signaling quality redistributes demand towards low-quality firms.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号