甘肃省乡村旅游示范村与A级旅游景区空间协同发展研究

目的]文章旨在探讨甘肃省乡村旅游示范村与A级旅游景区的空间协同关系及其发展现状，从交通和旅游经济发展要素两个方面发现问题，并提出空间协同发展的优化措施，以期为本地区旅游业的高质量发展提供一种新思路和新路径。方法]文章以甘肃省206个乡村旅游示范村和358个A级旅游景区为研究对象，首先分析了乡村旅游示范村与A级旅游景区的空间协同发展的意义与机理；其次从数量空间、质量空间和空间耦合协调度3个维度分析了二者的空间协同关系；最后运用ArcGIS软件从交通可达性和旅游经济发展要素两方面分析了甘肃省乡村旅游示范村与A级旅游景区协同发展的现状并提出优化措施。结果]（1）甘肃省乡村旅游示范村与A级旅游景区数量空间关联显著，质量空间关联属于优质协调水平，空间耦合协调水平表现为良好协调。（2）甘肃省14个市州乡村旅游示范村的交通可达性低于A级旅游景区。（3）甘肃省旅游经济要素点整体密度值较低，南北分布差异显著。结论]（1）加快区域内游客集散中心建设。（2）在旅游资源拟合程度较好的区域发展高等级道路。（3）在乡村旅游示范村和A级旅游景区拟合较好的区域，加强旅游基础设施建设。

RESEARCH ON THE SPATIAL COORDINATED DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL TOURISM DEMONSTRATION VILLAGES AND A-GRADE SCENIC SPOTS IN GANSU PROVINCE

In order to provide a new idea and a new path of the high-quality development of tourism in Gansu province, this study aims to explore the spatial coordinated relationship and current situation between rural tourism demonstration regions and A-level scenic spots in Gansu, and identify problems from transportation and tourism economic development factors, and put forward the optimization measures of spatial synergistic development. 206 rural tourism demonstration regions and 358 A-level scenic spots were explored in the study. Firstly, the significance and mechanism of spatial coordinated development of rural tourism demonstration regions and A-level scenic spots were analyzed; Secondly, the spatial coordinated relationship between rural tourism demonstration regions and A-level scenic spots from three dimensions: quantitative space, qualitative space and spatial coupling coordination degree were analyzed; Finally, ArcGIS software was used to analyze the current situation of the coordinated development of rural tourism demonstration regions and A-level scenic spots from the aspects of traffic accessibility and tourism economic development elements and then optimization measures were put forward. The results were showed as follows. (1) The spatial association between the number of rural tourism demonstration regions and A-level scenic spots was significant; the spatial association with quality was at the level of high-quality coordination, and the level of spatial coupling coordination was shown to be well-coordinated. (2) The traffic accessibility of rural tourism demonstration regions in 14 cities and states was lower than that of A-level scenic spots. (3) The overall density value of tourism economic factor points was low, and the north-south distribution varied significantly. The suggestions of this study are listed as follows. (1) To speed up the regional construction of tourist distribution centers. (2) To develop the regional high-grade roads with better fitting of tourism resources. (3) To strengthen the construction of tourism infrastructure in the regions with better fitting of rural tourism demonstration regions and A-level scenic spots.