Wage Bargaining, Inventories, and Union Legislation |
| |
Authors: | Melvyn G. Coles,& Andrew K. G. Hildreth |
| |
Affiliation: | University of Essex and Universitat Autonoma Barcelona,;University of California, Berkeley |
| |
Abstract: | This paper analyses a strategic bargaining game where the firm may or maynot be able to sell out of its inventory of finished goods during astrike. Firms and the union are both risk neutral and have the same discountrate. It is shown that the wage equilibrium corresponds to the axiomaticNash bargaining solution where the threatpoints are the agents' payoffsshould bargaining continue indefinitely. We use the 1980 and 1982 EmploymentActs to test this theory, interpreting that legislation change as changingthe firm's threatpoint but not its bargaining power. This allows us toidentify the value of the firm's threatpoint post-1982. Formal testssupport the theory. Also consistent with the theory, it is found that unionwages decrease with inventories after 1982, but not before, and that theunion wage gap is smaller after 1982. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|