| 金融行业监管费征收对比分析与思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李艳,朱俊虹.金融行业监管费征收对比分析与思考[J].上海金融,2008(2):53-55. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李艳 朱俊虹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南财经大学,四川成都,610074 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 截至2007年上半年,金融行业资产规模增长迅速,在我国分业监管的框架下,各行业对应的监管部门普遍采用征收监管费的模式。本文就保险、证券、期货和银行等不同行业的监管收费模式进行了对比分析,比较了不同监管部门的监管策略和不同行业的监管模式,从而为我国金融行业的监管创新提供参考。
|
| 关 键 词： | 监管收费模式 金融混业 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-1428(2008)02-0053-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年10月26 |
The comparison of supervisory fee charge models in financial industry and subsequent thoughts |
| |
| Li Yan,Zhu Junhong.The comparison of supervisory fee charge models in financial industry and subsequent thoughts[J].Shanghai Finance,2008(2):53-55. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Yan Zhu Junhong |
| |
| Institution: | Li Yan Zhu Junhon |
| |
| Abstract: | By the first half in 2007,the capital scale of financial industries has expanded quickly.In the frame of separate regulation,the supervisors of different sectors charge different supervisory fees.This article analyzes different charge model in insurance,securities,futures and banking sectors.It also compares different regulative strategies and models,and gives reference for Chinese financial supervisory innovation. |
| |
| Keywords: | Supervisory Fee Charge Model Financial Mixed Operation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
