首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


25 Years of Dutch Ipos: An Examination of Frequently Cited Ipo Anomalies Within Main Sectors and During Hot- and Cold-Issue Periods
Authors:R Q Doeswijk  H S K Hemmes  R H Venekamp
Institution:(1) Institute for Research and Investment Services (IRIS), research enterprise of Rabobank and Robeco, P.O. Box 1296, 3000, BG, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;(2) Fortis Meespierson, P.O. Box 293, 1000, AG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;(3) Robeco, P.O. Box 973, 3000, AZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract:Summary This study examines the existence of the initial underpricing and the long-term underperformance anomalies in the Dutch IPO market between 1977 and 2001. We found an average initial underpricing level of 17.6%, measured relative to a sector-specific benchmark. The median initial return was 5.0%, while there were negative initial returns in only 17% of the IPOs. During their first 3 years of listing, IPOs on average underperformed their benchmark by a cumulative 10.0%, but this result is statistically insignificant. The period 1997—beginning of 2000 was a true hot-issue period for growth stocks: their level of initial underpricing was 35.8%, compared to 9.2% during cold-issue periods. These growth IPOs also significantly underperformed their benchmark by 38.4% after 3 years.The authors are grateful to Nico van der Sar for his constructive comments and to two anonymous referees for their useful suggestions.
Keywords:Dutch stock market  IPO  hot- and cold-issue periods  initial underpricing  long-term underperformance
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号