首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

科学社会学理论视角下科技社团治理有效性评价与检验
引用本文:鲁云鹏. 科学社会学理论视角下科技社团治理有效性评价与检验[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(24): 125-133. DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020070401
作者姓名:鲁云鹏
作者单位:(1. 燕山大学 经济管理学院;2. 燕山大学 区域经济发展研究中心,河北 秦皇岛 066004)
基金项目:河北省高等学校项目;河北省科协调研课题项目
摘    要:以治理目标为导向的结果有效作为评价重点,依照科学社会学中的科学二分法理论,结合典型文献构建具体评价指标体系,并对其进行检验与实证分析。主要结论如下:第一,科技社团治理目标的实现程度正向显著影响组织社会影响力与满意度水平;第二,当前我国科技社团总体治理有效性水平处于起步阶段,科技传播能力较强,但科技服务能力明显偏弱,且学会之间存在分化现象。其中,医科类较好,交叉学科则表现欠佳;第三,我国科技社团治理改革内在驱动力不足,政策效用与行政干预现象较明显。事实上,行政干预力量最弱的科技社团,其治理有效性水平反而最高。当前,治理转型的突破口集中在挂靠到事业单位的科技社团。

关 键 词:科技社团  治理有效性  治理评价  科学社会学  
收稿时间:2020-10-13

Evaluation and Test of the Governance Effectiveness of Science and Technology Communities based on the Theory of Sociology of Science
Lu Yunpeng. Evaluation and Test of the Governance Effectiveness of Science and Technology Communities based on the Theory of Sociology of Science[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2020, 37(24): 125-133. DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020070401
Authors:Lu Yunpeng
Affiliation:(1.School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University; 2.Regional Economic Development Research Center, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)
Abstract:Taking the result effectiveness of governance goal-oriented as the evaluation key point, and based on the theory of science dichotomy and typical literature, a specific evaluation index system is constructed in this paper. Moreover, this evaluation index system is tested and empirical analyzed. Here are the main conclusions: firstly, the achievement of the science and technology communities' governance goals will positively and significantly affect the organizations' social influence and satisfaction level. Secondly, the overall governance effectiveness of science and technology communities in China is at the initial stage, and compared with S&T service capability, the S&T communication capability is much better. There is a phenomenon of differentiation among these science and technology communities, among which the medical disciplines are better, and the interdisciplinary performance is poor. Thirdly, the internal driving force of China's science and technology communities' governance reform is insufficient, and the effects of policy and administrative intervention are relatively obvious. However, the science and technology communities with weakest administrative intervention has the highest level of governance effectiveness. At present, the breakthrough of governance transformation focuses on the China's scientific and technological communities which are affiliated to public institutions.
Keywords:Scientific and Technological Communities  Governance Effectiveness  Governance Evaluation  Sociology of Science  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号