首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Using scenarios to explore UK upland futures
Authors:MS Reed  K Arblaster  C Bullock  RJF Burton  AL Davies  J Holden  K Hubacek  R May  J Mitchley  J Morris  D Nainggolan  C Potter  CH Quinn  V Swales  S Thorp
Institution:a Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability and Centre for Planning and Environmental Management, School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, St Mary's, Aberdeen AB24 3UF, UK
b Centre for Plant Diversity and Systematics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AS, UK
c School of Geography, Planning &; Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Richview, Clonskeagh Dublin 4, Ireland
d Agresearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre Puddle Alley, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand
e School of Biological &; Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
f School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
g Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth &; Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS2 9JT, UK
h Moorland Association and the Heather Trust, Sunrise House, Hulley Road, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 2LP, UK
i School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK
j 47/2 Queen Charlotte Street, Edinburgh EH6 7EY, UK
k The Heather Trust, Newtonrigg, Holywood, Dumfries DG2 0RA, UK
Abstract:Uplands around the world are facing significant social, economic and environmental changes, and decision-makers need to better understand what the future may hold if they are to adapt and maintain upland goods and services. This paper draws together all major research comprising eight studies that have used scenarios to describe possible futures for UK uplands. The paper evaluates which scenarios are perceived by stakeholders to be most likely and desirable, and assesses the benefits and drawbacks of the scenario methods used in UK uplands to date. Stakeholders agreed that the most desirable and likely scenario would be a continuation of hill farming (albeit at reduced levels) based on cross-compliance with environmental measures. The least desirable scenario is a withdrawal of government financial support for hill farming. Although this was deemed by stakeholders to be the least likely scenario, the loss of government support warrants close attention due to its potential implications for the local economy. Stakeholders noted that the environmental implications of this scenario are much less clear-cut. As such, there is an urgent need to understand the full implications of this scenario, so that upland stakeholders can adequately prepare, and policy-makers can better evaluate the likely implications of different policy options. The paper concludes that in future, upland scenario research needs to: (1) better integrate in-depth and representative participation from stakeholders during both scenario development and evaluation; and (2) make more effective use of visualisation techniques and simulation models.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号