首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Optimal climate change mitigation under long-term growth uncertainty: Stochastic integrated assessment and analytic findings
Institution:1. Department of Socioeconomics, WU - Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria;2. IIASA and WIIW - Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Austria;3. Department of Economics, Oxford University, Manor Road Building, Manor Road, Oxford OX1 3UQ, UK;4. St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg 199034, Russia;5. VU University Amsterdam, Netherlands;1. Department of Economics, University of Bologna, Italy;2. Department of Economics, University of Bologna, Italy and Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece;1. Department of Economics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UQ, United Kingdom;2. Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15551, 1001 NB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;3. Department of Socio-Economics, University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1.D5, Vienna 1020, Austria;4. IIASA, International Institute for Applied System Analysis, Laxenburg 2361, Austria;5. The Economics and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson''s Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland;6. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Abstract:Economic growth over the coming centuries is one of the major determinants of today?s optimal greenhouse gas mitigation policy. At the same time, long-run economic growth is highly uncertain. This paper is the first to evaluate optimal mitigation policy under long-term growth uncertainty in a stochastic integrated assessment model of climate change. The sign and magnitude of the impact depend on preference characteristics and on how damages scale with production. We explain the different mechanisms driving optimal mitigation under certain growth, under uncertain technological progress in the discounted expected utility model, and under uncertain technological progress in a more comprehensive asset pricing model based on Epstein–Zin–Weil preferences. In the latter framework, the dominating uncertainty impact has the opposite sign of a deterministic growth impact; the sign switch results from an endogenous pessimism weighting. All of our numeric scenarios use a DICE based assessment model and find a higher optimal carbon tax than the deterministic DICE base case calibration.
Keywords:Integrated assessment of climate change  Growth uncertainty  Social cost of carbon  Risk aversion  Epstein–Zin–Weil preferences
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号