Enforcement,payments, and development projects near protected areas: how the market setting determines what works where |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;2. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington;1. Seago Botanical Consulting, Minetto, NY, USA, & SUNY at Oswego, NY, USA;2. Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Charles University, Prague, CZ, Czech Republic;3. Department of Botany, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper examines a model of the decisions made by developing country protected area managers that recognizes that rural people react to policies differently in various market settings. For each of three market settings, the paper identifies the make-up of an optimal management plan that consists of three possible policies: enforcement, agricultural development projects, and conservation payments. The results ground a discussion of the likelihood of success of conservation policies, the failure of Integrated Conservation and Development Projects, and the use of some policies as mechanisms to compensate rural people for lost access to resources within protected areas. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
