| 金融犯罪新罪名司法适用的实证分析与理性反思 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 彭少辉. 金融犯罪新罪名司法适用的实证分析与理性反思[J]. 上海商学院学报, 2011, 0(4) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 彭少辉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学研究生教育学院; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养专项资金项目“金融领域犯罪新问题实证研究——以上海国际金融中心建设为背景”项目编号:103092; 2010年度国家社科基金项目“近年金融领域刑事司法状态的实证研究” |
| |
| 摘 要： | 近年来,金融刑事立法活动呈十分积极的态势,而与之形成鲜明对比的是,司法实务部门对金融犯罪新罪名的适用却相当谨慎。这种现象的原因主要有:刑事立法与司法错位,导致法律虚置现象;犯罪构成要件不甚明确,立法技术有待提高;刑事政策宽容,司法非犯罪化;金融刑事司法人员专业素质的局限性等等。推进金融刑事司法工作,保障金融市场健康发展需要做到:协调金融刑事立法与司法,注重立法效绩,加强司法人员专业素质培养,坚持宽严相济的刑事司法政策,探索金融刑事司法制度创新。
|
| 关 键 词： | 金融犯罪 新罪名 刑事司法 实证分析 |
New Financial Crime Charges Empirical Analysis of the Judicial Application with Rational Thought |
| |
| PENG Shaohui. New Financial Crime Charges Empirical Analysis of the Judicial Application with Rational Thought[J]. , 2011, 0(4) |
| |
| Authors: | PENG Shaohui |
| |
| Affiliation: | PENG Shaohui (East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | In recent years,while criminal legislation of financial activities is very positive,the judiciary on the new charges applicable to financial crime is,in contrast,overcautious.Reasons to account for this phenomenon include discrepancy between legislation and judicature which lead to idle law,lack of clarity with major components of a crime,inadequate legislative technique,over-tolerant criminal judicial policy,and low professional quality of judicial personnel.To promote financial justice and to protect the ... |
| |
| Keywords: | financial crime new charges criminal judicial empirical analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
