Duty,obligation, and responsibility in accounting policy making

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has been under considerable pressure in recent years to choose among accounting standard alternatives based on their anticipated economic consequences. It is the Boards's stated position, however, that standards ought to be chosen for the faithfulness of the representations they will bring about. This paper examines the philosophical justification for the opposing positions on the economic consequences issue. The issue is first examined as one of ends and means, and it is found that accounting policy makers have a stronger obligation to pursue faithful representations than they have a responsibility to pursue good economic consequences. A similar result is found when the ends—means distinction is dropped and the issue is examined as involving conflicting duties to refrain and to act. The conclusion is reached that there is no justification for departing from faithful representations.