Urban planning: an ‘undisciplined’ discipline? |
| |
Authors: | Daniel Pinson |
| |
Affiliation: | CIRTA (Centre Interdisciplinaire de recherche sur les Territoires et leur Aménagement), Institut d’Aménagement Régional, Université de Droit, d’Economie et des Sciences d’Aix-Marseilles, Marseilles, France |
| |
Abstract: | The need for cross disciplinary boundaries appeared in scientific research at least twenty years ago. Since its foundation, at the beginning of the 20th Century, urban planning has been claiming the assets of multidisciplinarity. It is particularly concerned with transgressing disciplinary boundaries. However, multidisciplinarity may weaken urban planning as a discipline, because it is a recent knowledge domain that has borrowed without questioning from the knowledge acquired in both the social and engineering sciences. Urban planning may forget to formulate an inventory and to build its own theoretical and practical assets. This article argues that it is only when a dsicipline has acquired its own identity that it can implement a fertile transdisciplinarity contribution. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|