Active Institutional Shareholders and Costs of Monitoring: Evidence from Executive Compensation |
| |
Authors: | Andres Almazan Jay C. Hartzell Laura T. Starks |
| |
Affiliation: | Associate Professor of Finance at the University of Texas in Austin, TX;Assistant Professor of Finance at the University of Texas in Austin, TX;Seay Regents' Chair and Professor of Finance at the University of Texas in Austin, TX |
| |
Abstract: | Although evidence suggests that institutional investors play a role in monitoring management, not all institutions are equally willing or able to serve this function. We present a stylized model that examines the effects of institutional monitoring on executive compensation. The model predicts that institutions' influence on managers' pay-for-performance sensitivity and level of compensation is enhanced when institutions have lower implied costs of monitoring, but that these effects are attenuated when the firm-specific cost of monitoring is high. Our empirical results are broadly consistent with these implications, suggesting that independent investment advisors and investment company managers have advantages in monitoring firms' management. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|