首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Equity or intention: it is the thought that counts
Institution:1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Stawki 5/7, 00-183 Warszawa, Poland;2. Institute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, Bażyńskiego 4, 80-952 Gdańsk, Poland;3. Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Dębinki 7, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland;4. Department of Neurology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA;1. Department of Psychology, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA;2. Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA;1. University of Maryland, Department of Psychology, College Park, MD, USA;2. Jagiellonian University, Institute of Psychology, Krakow, Poland;3. Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK;1. University of Nottingham;2. CESifo;3. IZA;4. School of Economics, Sir Clive Granger Building, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Abstract:Economists theorize how and when other-regarding behavior determines experimental outcomes. Two approaches are: (1) explicitly model fairness—intentions matter and (2) use inequity aversion as a proxy for fairness—only the outcome matters. The first approach is consistent with people behaving as though they think, “He was as fair as he could be; do not punish him”. The second approach is consistent with people behaving as though they think, “Despite his best efforts, the outcome was inequitable; punish him”. The results of this experiment are consistent with the fairness-based model, that is, “It is the thought that counts”.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号