The permanent income hypothesis in an underdeveloped economy

After a concise but critical survey of several tests of the permanent income hypothesis (PIH), the authors advance their own test for India using annual data from 1919–1960. It employs Friedman's technique for calculating the permanent value of a variable. Two different specifications of the model are tested, using different values of the consumer's ‘horizon.’ In almost all cases it is found that the marginal propensity to consume out of transitory income is very similar to the marginal propensity to consume out of permanent income. The authors conclude that even a looser variant of the PIH is not valid for India. However, no valid generalization with respect to the appropriate planning horizon can be made, for the PIH was almost equally invalid with a horizon of one, two and two-and-a-half years. The authors briefly discuss the policy implications of their results for the savings efforts in underdeveloped countries.